re: building cheap water collection surface?
18 jun 2004
brent geery wrote:
>>i can get some cheap desert land in an area i really like, but the
>>problem is access to water... we are talking an arid region, with
>>about 4" average yearly precipitation...
i wonder where...
>if there's lots of sun, why not distill the water you drink in
>a greenhouse and filter the rest through a high-temp wetland
>in the greenhouse that serves as the evaporator?
take phoenix, please. nrel says 1020 btu/ft^2 of sun falls on the ground
and 1550 falls on a south wall on an average 53.6 f january (the worst-
case month for solar heating) day, so a 16'x16'x8' tall greenhouse would
collect about 0.8(256x1020+128x1550) = 368k btu of sun. distilling 10
gallons of potable water at 1,000 btu/lb would leave 368k-83k = 284k btu.
with 600 ft^2 of r1.2 surface, the greenhouse thermal conductance would
be 500 btu/h-f, so 284k btu could keep it 53.6+284k/(24hx500) = 80 f (27 c)
on an average day.
you might put a outer layer of plastic film over 4 16' long x 8' tall
outer bows and another layer over 4 inner bows, with a slot at the top
to allow warm moist air to enter the spaces between the glazings and
condense water into east and west troughs on the ground made from a fold
in the outer layer, with a slot in the inner layer above the trough to
allow the air to recirculate. the troughs might also collect rainwater.
the greenhouse might have a gravel bed over an epdm layer to make an
metcalf and eddy say an average family produces 400 gallons per day of
wastewater with a 200 mg/l bod concentration, ie about 0.7 lb/day, and
it needs about 175 ft^2 of surface for treatment. sherwood reed says
blackwater contains more than 75% of the nitrogen in only 40% of the
flow. eliminate that with a composting toilet, and you might only treat
240 gallons per day (0.908 m^3/day) with 0.175 lb of bod, ie 86 mg/l.
can we purify this to 10 mg/l (a tertiary sewage treatment standard)
and recycle it for non-potable uses? pe sherwood reed's natural systems
for waste management and treatment book (mcgraw hill, 2nd edition, 1995)
has a detailed design procedure for constructed wetlands, aka "attached-
growth biological reactors." they work well at higher temperatures.
equation 6.38 on page 226 of reed's book says the rate constant for
bod removal in subsurface-flow wetlands at 20 c is k20 = 1.104d^-1.
equation 6.34 makes k27 = 1.104x1.06^(27-20) = 1.66d^-1 at 27 c. we
need to reduce the bod from co = 86 to ce = 10 mg/l with 256 ft^2
(23.8 m^2) of surface. if the bed is "medium gravel" (d10 = 32 mm)
with a 0.38 porosity, it needs to be 0.908ln(co/ce)/(k27x23.8x0.38)
= 0.13 meters deep, ie 5.1 inches. we might add gravel or divide
the bed into 3 series cells for better plug flow and performance.
what will grow in this rainforest? will it need summertime shading?
don't miss this opportunity to have every solar question you ever asked
answered in four different ways...
join solar guru steve baer and pe drew gillett and phd rich komp and
me for an all-day workshop on solar house heating and natural cooling
strategies ("hvac nonsense") on july 9 in portland, or--see page 25 of
be careful where you park.